Playbook · Pilot readiness
What to validate before a paid pilot
Camera angles, lighting, network, privacy, acceptance criteria and the evidence needed for a go / no-go.

Why the study comes before the pilot
Most disappointing AI-camera projects fail before the software is switched on: the camera could not see the condition, the lighting changed at night, nobody owned the response, or the “accuracy” was a number nobody could reproduce on site. A paid Site & Scenario Readiness Study exists to find those failures on paper, for a fraction of a pilot’s cost, and to end with a written go / no-go that belongs to you.
Whether the scenario is a warehouse dock, a mall service counter or a factory station, the same ten items decide readiness.
The ten-point site-readiness check
Score each item 0 (missing), 1 (partial) or 2 (confirmed). This is the same scoring used inside the study.
- Visible problem. The condition you care about is actually visible from an existing camera angle, and it occupies enough pixels and time to judge.
- Suitable cameras. Resolution, field of view, lighting across the shift, occlusion and retention are known for each candidate camera.
- Stream and network access. RTSP/IP streams are reachable, the network segmentation is understood, and someone has authority to configure it.
- Named workflow owner. A specific person receives the exception and closes the loop — including at 9 p.m. on a Sunday for a retail portfolio.
- Economic buyer. The person who funds a production rollout is identified and reachable.
- Measurable baseline. Today’s manual check is described: who does it, how often, what a miss costs. Without a baseline there is nothing to measure the pilot against.
- Privacy path. Model A (media stays on site) or Model B (approved frames leave under documented approval) is chosen per site, and biometric processing is out of scope.
- Support fit. Service hours and escalation are agreed in writing rather than assumed.
- Paid-pilot budget. The organisation can fund a bounded pilot and a production path if the pilot passes.
- Expansion potential. There is a second site or a second scenario worth reaching if the first proves out.
16–20: propose the paid study and pilot. 11–15: close the gaps first. 0–10: defer — a pilot now would consume goodwill without producing evidence.

Acceptance criteria are written before the pilot starts
A pilot is accepted against criteria agreed in advance and signed by a named owner on the customer’s side. The seven categories:
| Category | What gets written down |
|---|---|
| Scenario definition | Scenario name, camera views, the operational question, the rule in plain language. |
| Ground truth | How many labelled test cases, who labels them, and the video window used. |
| Performance measures | Precision, recall, false-alert count and miss count at the agreed threshold. |
| Operational measure | Share of exceptions acknowledged within the agreed window; reports delivered on schedule. |
| Capacity measure | Throughput against the sizing estimate; latency measured end to end for your scenario and network. |
| Business measure | Baseline versus pilot: hours saved, missed checks reduced, incident evidence produced. |
| Acceptance decision | Pass, fail-with-remediation, or no-go — signed by a named owner. |
Accuracy is measured during your pilot against agreed test cases. That number is real, and it is yours — which is exactly why it is not quoted in advance.


Three scenario examples
- Warehouse dock monitoring. Rule: “bay 3 attended within 10 minutes of a trailer docking”. Validate: the dock camera sees both the trailer and the bay floor; night lighting; who at the 3PL closes the exception.
- Mall operations. Rule: “information counter attended during opening hours”. Validate: counter is visible without occlusion from signage; the regional operations lead receives the weekly branch comparison.
- Factory station. Rule: “station 4 attended during operating hours”. Validate: angle shows the operator position; shift schedule loaded; production supervisor owns the exception.
What a good go / no-go contains
Camera census with suitability notes per camera; N/L/A sizing (recorded, live, continuous-AI counts); the workflow baseline; the privacy map with the Model A/B recommendation; the draft acceptance criteria; and an investment estimate. If the verdict is no-go, you keep the conclusions — that is what the study fee buys.
Bring one site to a 30-minute clinic
We run the first pass of this checklist with you live and send a Readiness Study proposal within 48 hours.
Industrial clinic Retail & property clinic